Comparison of the Effectiveness of Couple Therapy based on Self-Regulated and Acceptance and Commitment on Perspective-Taking and Marital Target Orientation of Married Women

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD Student, Dept of psychology, Bushehr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bushehr, Iran.

2 Assistant Prof, Dept of psychology, Bushehr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bushehr, Iran.

10.22123/chj.2024.432090.2052

Abstract

Introduction: The rising divorce rate in Iranian society is a clear sign of the turmoil in marital life in Iranian families and the use of effective interventions to control this turmoil is essential. Therefore, this study was conducted to comparison of the effectiveness of couple therapy based on self-regulated and acceptance and commitment on Perspective-Taking and Marital Target Orientation of married women.
Materials and Methods: The present study is a quasi-experimental of pre-test, post-test and two-month follow-up. All married women referring to counseling and psychotherapy centers in Bushehr in 2019-220 formed the statistical population of the study, with by available sampling, 60 people were selected and randomly assigned to three equal groups. Therapeutic interventions were applied to the experimental groups in 8 sessions (2 sessions of 90 minutes per week), but the control group did not receive any intervention. The Other Dyadic Perspective-Taking scal (ODPT) and Kansas Marital Goals Orientation Scale (ODPT) were used to collect data. Data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance with repeated measurements
Results: The results showed that both treatment methods have Increased the perspective-taking and marital target orientation in married women (P<0.05). Also, benferroni post hoc test results showed that there is no significant difference in the effectiveness of two methods of couple therapy based on self- regulated and couple therapy based on acceptance and commitment on the dependent variables of perspective-taking and marital target Orientation (P<0.05).
Conclusion: The use of interventions based on self-regulated and acceptance and commitment can increase the Perspective-Taking and marital target orientation in married women.
 

Keywords

References

  1. Moradi E, Shahbazi M, Ferasat H, Goodarzi K. Development of a Model for Predicting Marital Heartbrea through Attachment Styles: The Mediating Role of Anger. FCPJ 2023; 13(1): 1-36. [Persian]
  2. Stavroulia KE, Lanitis A. The role of perspective-taking on empowering the empathetic behavior of educators in VR-based training sessions: An experimental evaluation. Computers & Education 2023; 197, 104739.
  3. Dede Yildirim E, Frosch CA, Santos AJ, Veríssimo M, Bub K, Vaughn, BE. Antecedents to and outcomes associated with teacher–child relationship perceptions in early childhood: Further evidence for childdriven effects. Child Development 2023; 21(2):179-206.
  4. Imanikia Z, Zangeneh Motlagh F, Bayat M. Comparison the Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment-Based Education Approach and Emotion-Based Cognitive Therapy Approach on Their Cognitive Perspective, Spouse's Cognitive Perspective in Conflicting Couples. RBS 2022; 19 (4): 575-589. [Persian]
  5. Khatami FS, Zanganeh Motlagh F. The effectiveness of positivism training with an islamic approach on self-control, self-compassion, and the other dyadic perspective taking in married women. AFTJ 2019; 1(4): 72-88. [Persian]
  6. Khojastehmehr R, Roshanravan N, Abbaspour Z. Self Dyadic Perspective Taking(SDPT) and Other Dyadic PerspectiveTaking (ODPT) as predictors of marital satisfaction. JAC 2018; 7(2): 33-44. [Persian]
  7. Hosseini SA, Maleki B. Explanation of academic emotions based on academic support and the goal orientation of progress with the mediating role of academic self-regulation. Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences Research Journal 2022; 12(2): 143-168. [Persian]
  8. Schmuck P, Kasser T, Ryan RM. Intrinsic and extrinsic goals: Their structure and relationship to well-being in German and U. S. college students. Social Indicators Research 2000;50(2): 225–241.
  9. Tessier J, Joussemet M, Kurdi V, Mageau GA. How Perceived Detrimental Parenting Relates to Adolescents’ Intrinsic and Extrinsic Values. JCFS 2023; 32(4):1218-1231.
  10. Shafiei Z, Fatehizadeh M. Prediction of success based on couple variables of marital compatibility, orientation of marital goals and source of marital control in married women. Cultural-Educational Quarterly of Women and Family 2017; 13(45): 117-133. [Persian]
  11. Kanter JB, Lavner JA, Lannin DG, Hilgard J, Monk JK. Does couple communication predict later relationship quality and dissolution? a meta-analysis. JMF 2022; 84(2):533-551.
  12. Endeweld M, Herbst-Debby A, Kaplan A. Do the privileged always win? economic consequences of divorce by income and gender groups. Social Indicators Research 2022; 159(1):77-100.
  13. Kazemi N, Narimani M, SadeghiHashjin G, Basharpoor S. The effectiveness of brief self-regulation couple therapy (srct) on reducing marital covert relational aggression, changing of communication patterns and reduction of alexithymia among conflicting couples. JPS 2022; 20(108): 2225-2238. [Persian]
  14. Farahani F, Dokaneifard F, Delavar A. Comparison the effectiveness of couple therapy by method of self-regulated and acceptance and commitment on mental health of couples. Journal of Social Psychology 2018; 6(48):45-55. [Persian]
  15. Kargar M, Kimiaee SA, Mashhadi A. The Effectiveness of Group Couple Therapy based on Self-Regulated on Emotional Abuse and Martial Distress. FCPJ 2014; 4(2):269-297. [Persian]
  16. Potts S, Krafft J, Levin ME. A pilot randomized controlled trial of acceptance and commitment therapy guided self-help for overweight and obese adults high in weight self-stigma. Behavior Modification 2020; 46(1):178-201.
  17. Reardon KW, Lawrence E, Mazurek C. Adapting acceptance and commitment therapy to target intimate partner violence. Partner Abuse 2020; 11(4):447-
  18. Namvaran Germi K, Moradi A, Farzad V, Zahrakar K. Phenomenology of marital attraction among Iranian spouses: a qualitative study. FCPJ 2022; 11(2):1-24. [Persian]
  19. Manjezi F, Asadpour E, Rasouli M, Zahrakar K. Comparison of the effect schema and cognitive behavioral therapy on the cognitive regulation of emotions in girls adolescent of divorced. Journal of Applied Psychology 2023; 17(2): 91-113. [Persian]
  20. Delavar A. Research Methods in Psychology and Educational Sciences. Tehran: Roshd Publications; 2013: 180-182. [Persian]
  21. Halford W K. Brief couple therapy for couples. New York: Guilford publication. 2001.
  22. Gehart DR. Mindfulness and acceptance in couple and family therapy. First edition. New York: Springer Science-Business Media.
  23. First M, Spitzer R, Gibbon M, Williams JB. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (clinician version) SCID-I administration booklet. Washington DC, American Psychiatric Association.1997
  24. Fatahi, M., Dehghani, M. Analysis of the Perceptions of the Students of the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran College based on the Concept of thought Management. JAPR 2022; 12(4): 139-174. [Persian]
  25. Long EC, Andrews Perspective taking as a predictor of marital adjustment. Journal of personality and social psychology 1990; 59(1): 126-131.
  26. Eggeman K, Maxley V, Schumm WR. Assessing Spouses Perceptions of Gottmans Temporal Form in marital conflict. Psychological Reports 1985; 57: 171-181
  27. Pituch KA, Stevens JP. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences: Analyses with SAS and IBMs SPSS .6nd ed. NewYork: Publisher Routledge.2016.
  28. Adabi H, Azmoudeh M, Mesrabadi J, Hosseini Nasab S D. Determining the Effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavioral Couple Therapy on Marital Conflict, Marital Boredom, and Emotional Self-regulation of Couples at Risk of Divorce in Baneh City, Iran. MEJDS 2022; 207(12): 1-12. [Persian]
  29. Ghezelseflo, M., Rostami, M., Saadati, N. Effectiveness of emotional self- regulation on marital self- regulation of the newly married couples. AFTJ 2022; 3(2): 658-672. [Persian]
  30. Ferguson EK, Karan GC. The roles of self‐regulation and partner regulation on romantic relationship quality. Family process 2023; 62 (1): 406-422.
  31. Linder JN, Niño A, Negash S, Espinoza S. Thematic Analysis of Therapists’ Experiences Integrating EMDR and EFT in Couple Therapy: Conditions and Risks of Integration. IJST 2022; 33(3): 196-222.
  32. Maleki N, Madahi MI, Khalatbari J, Mohammadkhani Sh. Comparing the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral couple therapy and couple therapy based on acceptance and commitment on the social and psychological aspects of the quality of life of troubled couples. ‪Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology 2016; 1(4): 23-33. [Persian]
  33. Zarling A, Russell D. A randomized clinical trial of acceptance and commitment therapy and the Duluth Model classes for men court-mandated to a domestic violence program. JCCP 2022; 90(4):
  34. Ferreira MG, Mariano LI, de Rezende JV, Caramelli P, Kishita N. Effects of group Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) on anxiety and depressive symptoms in adults: A meta-analysis. JAD 2022; 309: 297-308.
  35. Kelly MM, Reilly ED, Ameral V, Richter S, Fukuda S . randomized pilot study of acceptance and commitment therapy to improve social support for veterans with PTSD. JCM 2022; 11(12): 3482.
Community Health Journal
Volume 17, Issue 4
April 2024
Pages 1-14

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics