سلامت جامعه

سلامت جامعه

رابطه بین سخت‌رویی و تاب‌آوری با ابعاد فرسودگی شغلی مراقبین معلولین جسمی، ذهنی و چندگانه سازمان بهزیستی شهر اصفهان، سال 1394

نویسندگان
مسلم اصلی آزاد 1
راشین رجایی 2
طاهره فرهادی 3
آفرین آقاسی 4
لاله شهیدی 5
1 دانشجوی دکتری روان شناسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، باشگاه پژوهشگران جوان و نخبگان، اصفهان، ایران.
2 کارشناسی ارشد مشاوره شغلی، دانشکده روان شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران.
3 کارشناسی ارشد روان شناسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، باشگاه پژوهشگران جوان و نخبگان، اصفهان، ایران.
4 کارشناسی ارشد روان شناسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد اصفهان(خوراسگان)، باشگاه پژوهشگران جوان و نخبگان، اصفهان، ایران.
5 دانشجوی دکتری روان شناسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد اصفهان(خوراسگان)، اصفهان، ایران.
چکیده
مقدمه: مراقبت از معلولین جسمی، ذهنی و چندگانه می‌تواند سلامت جسمی‌ و روانی مراقبت­کنندگان را تحت تأثیر قرار دهد. هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی رابطه سخت­رویی و تاب‌آوری با ابعاد فرسودگی شغلی در مراقبین معلولین جسمی، ذهنی و چند معلولیتی اداره بهزیستی استان اصفهان بود.

مواد و روش‌ها: این پژوهش از نوع توصیفی- مقطعی بود. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل تمام مراقبین معلولین جسمی، ذهنی و چندمعلولیتی اداره بهزیستی شهر اصفهان سال 1394 بود که با استفاده از روش سرشماری، همه 54 نفری که در جامعه پژوهش بودند، جهت شرکت در پژوهش انتخاب شدند. ابزار جمع‌آوری اطلاعات پرسشنامه سخت­رویی کوباسا، تاب‌آوری کانر و دیویدسون و پرسشنامه فرسودگی شغلی مسلش و جکسون بود. به منظور تجزیه و تحلیل آماری داده‌‌ها از روش ضریب همبستگی پیرسون استفاده شد.

یافته‌ها: بین مؤلفه‌ تعهد با خستگی عاطفی(001/0>p، 49/0r=-)، مؤلفه‌ کنترل با خستگی عاطفی (001/0>p، 49/0r=-) و عملکرد شخصی (001/0>p، 55/0r=)، مؤلفه‌ مبارزه­جویی با خستگی عاطفی (001/0>p،40/0r=-)، و با مسخ شخصیت (001/0>p، 30/0r=-)، رابطه معنی­دار وجود داشت. متغیر تاب‌آوری با متغیر خستگی عاطفی (001/0>p، 47 /0r=-) و عملکرد شخصی (001/0>p، 31 /0r=) دارای رابطه معنی­دار بود.

نتیجه ­گیری: با توجه به رابطه معنی­دار سخت­رویی و تاب­آوری با فرسودگی شغلی، نیاز است که مسئولین بهزیستی به مؤلفه‌‌های تاب­آوری و سخت­رویی مراقبین توجه بیشتر نمایند تا آنان کمتر فرسودگی شغلی را تجربه نمایند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
سخت ­رویی
تاب‌آوری
فرسودگی شغلی
مراقبین
اصفهان

عنوان مقاله English

Investigating the Relationship between Hardiness as well as Resiliency and Burnout Aspects in the Care givers of the physically, Mentally and Multiple retarded patients at the Welfare organization in 2015

نویسندگان English

M Asli Azad 1
R Rajaei 2
T Farhadi 3
A Aghasi 4
L Shahidi 5
1 PhD student of Psychology, Young researchers and Elite Club, Isfahan(Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
2 M.A of Job Counseling, Dept. of Psychology, Isfahan university, Isfahan, Iran.
3 M.A of General Psychology, Young researchers and Elite Club, Isfahan(Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
4 M.A of General Psychology, Young researchers and Elite Club, Isfahan(Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
5 PhD student of Psychology, Dept. of Psychology, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
چکیده English

Introduction: Caring for the physically, mentally and multiple retarded people can affect the caregivers’ physical and mental health. The objective of the present study was to investigate the relationship between hardiness as well as resiliency and burnout aspects in physically, mentally and multiple caregivers in the Behzisity welfare organization of Isfahan.

Material and method: this was a descriptive, cross-sectional study. The statistical population of the study included 54 physically, mentally and multiple caregivers at the Behzisity welfare organization of Isfahan  in 2015, all of whom were selected to take part in the research through census method. The data collection instrument included Kobasa’s hardiness questionnaire, Conner and Davidson’s resiliency questionnaire and Meslesh and Jackson’s burnout questionnaire. Pearson correlation coefficient method was used to statically analyze was a significant relationship between the component of affective tiredness (r= - 0.49, p<0.001), the component of control and affective tiredness (r=-0.40, p<0.001) and personal performance (r=0.55, p<0.001), the component of challenge and affective tiredness (r=-0.40, p<0.001) and depersonalization (r=-0.30, p<0.001). On the other hand, the variable of resiliency has a significant relationship with the variable of affective tiredness (r=-0.47, p<0.001) and personal performance (r=0.31, p<0.05).

Conclusion: Considering the significant relationship between hardiness as well as resiliency and burnout, it is suggested that the managers of the welfare organization to attend more to the caregivers’ components of resiliency and hardiness in order to experience less burnout.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

hardiness
resiliency
burnout
Caregivers
Isfahan
  1. Karanikola MN, Kleanthous E. Exploration of Burnout Risk Factors among Mental Health Nurses. Nosileftiki 2011;50(2):163-76.
  2. Qu H-Y, Wang C-M. Study on the relationships between nurses' job burnout and subjective well-being. Chinese Nursing Research 2015;2(2):61-6.
  3. Freudenberger  HJ. Staff burnout. Journal of Social Issues 1974; 30(1): 159–65.
  4. Zaikei A, Alikhani M ,Hojjat Khah SM. The relationship between resilience and organizational health with job burnout in female teachers Elementary at Kermanshah city. Journal of Industrial/ organizational psychology 2013; 3(11): 35-44. [Persian]
  1. Brouwers A, Tomic W. A longitudinal study of teacher burnout and perceived self-efficacy in classroom management. Teaching and Teacher education 2000;16(2):239-53.
  2. Maslach C, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP. Job burnout. Annual review of psychology 2001;52(1):397-422.
  3. Benzies K, Mychasiuk R.  Fostering family resiliency: a review of the key protective factors, Journal of child and Family social work 2009;14(1): 103-114.
  4. Inzlicht M, Aronson J, Good C, McKay L. A particular resiliency to threatening environments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2006;42(3):323-36.
  5. Friborg O, Hjemdal O, Rosenvinge JH, Martinussen M, Aslaksen PM, Flaten MA. Resilience as a moderator of pain and stress. Journal of psychosomatic research 2006;61(2):213-9.
  6. Shakerinia E,Mohamadpour M. Relation Personality hardiness and Professional Burnout Nurses in the Rasht. Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine 2011; 14(2): 161-9. [Persian]
  7. Narimani M , Abbasi M. Investigating the relationship between psychological hardiness and self-resilience and burnout. Above management 2009; 2(8):75-92. [Persian]
  8. Azeem SM. Personality hardiness, job involvement and job burnout among teachers. International Journal of Vocational and Technical Education 2010;2(3):36-40. [Persian]
  9. Aghajani MJ, Tizdast T, Abbas Ghorbani M , Bajvar M. Relationship between psychological hardiness and burnout in nurses. Holistic nursing and midwifery 2012; 23(70): 1-7. [Persian]
  10. Soares J, Grossi G, Sundin Ö. Burnout among women: associations with demographic/socio-economic, work, life-style and health factors. Archives of Women's Mental Health 2007;10(2):61-71.
  11. NaghiPour M. Relationship between Parenting practices with children’s hardiness. Journal of Educational Psychology 2012; 2(6): 13-30. [Persian]
  12. Kravetz S, Drory Y, Florian V. Hardiness and sense of coherence and their relation to negative affect. European Journal of Personality 1993;7(4):233-44.
  13. Maddi SR, Khoshaba DM. Hardiness and mental health. Journal of personality Assessment1994;63(2):265-74.
  1. Cress VC, Lampman C. Hardiness, Stress, and Health-Promoting Behaviors Among College Students. Psi Chi Journal of Undergraduate Research 2007;12(1):18-23.
  2. Maddi SR, Harvey RH, Khoshaba DM, Fazel M, Resurreccion N. Personality construct of hardiness, iv: Positive cognitions and emotions concerning oneself and developmentally relevant activities. Journal of Humanistic Psychology 2009; 49(3): 292-305.
  3. Civitci N, Civitci A. Social Comparison Orientation, Hardiness and Life Satisfaction in Undergraduate Students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 2015;205:516-23.
  1. Ogelman HG, Erol A. Examination of the Predicting Effect of the Resiliency Levels of Parents on the Resiliency Levels of Preschool Children. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 2015;186:461-6.
  2. Kaner S, Bayraklı H. Family resilience scale: development, reliability and validity. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education 2010;11(2):47-62.
  1. Kobasa SC, Maddi SR, Kahn S. Hardiness and health: a prospective study. Journal of personality and social psychology 1982;42(1):168-9.
  1. Connor KM, Davidson JR. Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor‐Davidson resilience scale (CD‐RISC). Depression and anxiety 2003;18(2):76-82.
  2.   Khabbaz M, Behjati Z, Naseri M. The relationship between social support and coping styles, and resiliency in young boys. Journal of Applied Psychology 2011;.5 (4): 108-23. [Persian]
  3. Besharat MA , Abbas Pour DT. Relationship with resilience and creativity of the students' metacognitive strategies. New findings in the journal Psychology 2012;5(14): 109-22. [Persian]
  4.  Maslach C, Jackson SE. The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of organizational behavior 1981;2(2):99-113.
  5. Badri GR.(dissertation). Psychological burnout syndrome teachers and mechanisms
    Coping.Tehran. Tarbiat Modarres University; 1995: 92-96.
  6. Paleologou AM, Dellaporta A. Hardiness vs alienation personality construct essentially explains burnout proclivity and erroneous computer entry problems in rural Hellenic hospital labs. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering 2009;3(4):282-97.
  7. Swider BW, Zimmerman RD. Born to burnout: A meta-analytic path model of personality, job burnout, and work outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior 2010;76(3):487-506.
  8. Alarcon G, Eschleman KJ, Bowling NA. Relationships between personality variables and burnout: A meta-analysis. Work & stress2009;23(3):244-63.
  9. Sheard M. Hardiness commitment, gender, and age differentiate university academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology 2009;79(1):189-204.
  10. Kim DH, Yoo IY. Factors associated with resilience of school age children with cancer. Journal of paediatrics and child health 2010;46(7‐8):431-6.
  11. Ahangar RG. A study of resilience in relation to personality, cognitive styles and decision making style of management students. African Journal of Business Management 2010;4(6):953-61.
  12. Amini F. The relationship between resiliency And Nurses job burnout. Journal of Research Development in Nursing And Midwifery 2014; 11(2): 94 – 102. [Persian]
  13. Ebrahimi GS. The relationship between resiliency And job satisfaction in the teachers of conventional and exceptional schools in Tehran .Quarterly psychology of exceptional individuals 2011; 1(1):67-81. [Persian]
سلامت جامعه
دوره 10، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 28
28
تابستان 1395
صفحه 24-32